Details
-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Open
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Affects Version/s: 1.4
-
Fix Version/s: 2.0
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
Description
Currently when masking coordinates the arrays are flattened so that 'inner' masked points can be removed, e.g.:
[[1.0, 2.0, 3.0],
[4.0, NaN, 6.0],
[7.0, 8.0, 9.0]]
- > [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0]
However in some cases the data isn't really two dimensional, they are orthogonal coordinates, so that we are more likely to have:
[[1.0, 2.0, 3.0],
[NaN, NaN, NaN],
[6.0, 7.0, 8.0]]
and we want to keep the 2D structure:
[[1.0, 2.0, 3.0],
[6.0, 7.0, 8.0]]
In order to fix this we need to be able to discern between the two cases. Ideally the second case wouldn't actually even be a 2D structure to start with, but this requires the data model changes discussed in JASCIS-248.
[[1.0, 2.0, 3.0],
[4.0, NaN, 6.0],
[7.0, 8.0, 9.0]]
- > [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0]
However in some cases the data isn't really two dimensional, they are orthogonal coordinates, so that we are more likely to have:
[[1.0, 2.0, 3.0],
[NaN, NaN, NaN],
[6.0, 7.0, 8.0]]
and we want to keep the 2D structure:
[[1.0, 2.0, 3.0],
[6.0, 7.0, 8.0]]
In order to fix this we need to be able to discern between the two cases. Ideally the second case wouldn't actually even be a 2D structure to start with, but this requires the data model changes discussed in JASCIS-248.
Attachments
Issue Links
- associated with
-
JASCIS-368 The summary method shouldn't trigger data loading
-
- Open
-
- is dependant on
-
JASCIS-248 Aggregation of individual dimensions in ungridded data
-
- Open
-